The problem with politics in America boils down to this: General Electric piled up $14 billion in profits last year and paid ZERO in income taxes; GE’s chief executive Jeffrey Immelt, who coordinated the massive political effort to win those tax breaks, received millions in salary and an appointment by Barack Obama to head up the President’s National Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. No joke! Meanwhile, the after-tax pay for the ordinary worker has fallen in real dollars in the past 30 years, yet too many white voters would rather side with pro-business, anti-“those people” politicians because of their deep cultural fears and biases. A coalition of labor, civic rights, women’s and other groups is holding a “We Are One” silent rally in Raleigh on April 4 to honor Dr. Martin Luther King’s vision of the human family. It’s part of a national effort to counter the Koch-funded Tea Party and similar anti-worker hate organizations. It’s a good place to be on the 43rd anniversary of King’s assassination. You can also sign up here and tell Mr. Immelt and Mr. Obama to find a better head to lead the Jobs Council. How many signers will it take to replace this dud bulb?
Archive for March, 2011
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Wednesday, March 30th, 2011
Noted constitutional law professor Richard Hazen (host of Election Law Blog) has written an essay for Slate that probes the rationale behind US Supreme Court rulings on cases involving political spending and contributions. The Court should protect the First Amendment “free speech” rights of individuals to support candidates, but it also must protect a free and fair election system from corruption or the appearance of being thoroughly rigged. In truth, the majority of Supremes care about neither as much as they worry about protecting the privilege of private wealth to buy what it wants. That’s a view we’ve expressed more than once on this site, and it’s somewhat startling to see Hazen, the independent expert, agree: “If you are looking for a common thread between the ‘more speech is better’ theory underlying Citizens United and an expected ‘more speech is unfair’ ruling for the challengers in McComish [Arizona matching funds case], it is this: Five conservatives justices on the Supreme Court appear to have no problem with the wealthy using their resources to win elections — even if doing so raises the danger of increased corruption of the political system.”
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Tuesday, March 29th, 2011
Following up Friday’s posting about the public campaign financing case in the US Supreme Court, here are stories about Monday’s arguments written by the Associated Press, Washington Post and New York Times. The same five justices who twisted common sense and judicial precedent to open the door for massive corporate spending in elections were ready to gut the matching funds provision that protects publicly financed candidates from exactly that kind of excessive spending.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Friday, March 25th, 2011
The US Supreme Court will hear arguments on Monday about the constitutionality of the matching (or rescue) funds provision in Arizona’s public financing program. We have a similar provision in our North Carolina programs, so the ultimate decision (expected in late summer) will affect us, too. The Brennan Center has an overview of the issues in the McComish v. Bennett case, plus links to various resources; and Justice at Stake calls attention to the decision’s impact on judicial public financing programs, like the one we have in North Carolina. Even if the Supremes rule against a government program providing rescue funds to qualified candidates, that does not mean the end of public financing. The New York City system and the federal Fair Elections Now Act are models of programs that provide adequate resources for a candidate without relying on that provision.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Thursday, March 24th, 2011
A significant number of legislators in Raleigh seem determined to help big political donors gut regulations and overturn state laws that protect consumers, public health and the environment. The poor state of accessible campaign finance data makes it difficult to track the pay-to-play culture, but Democracy North Carolina has highlighted the undue influence in several cases involving telecommunications firms, coastal landowners, and billboard companies. Despite promises by the new Republican leaders to cut the strings to big donors, each day seems to bring another proposal that benefits a group of private patrons at the expense of the common good. Even Republican strategist Carter Wrenn flogs Sen. Harry Brown (R-Onslow) for helping vacation homeowners with special-interest legislation that could cost taxpayers millions of dollars. (For more about Sen. Brown and coastal donors, see the charts with our report.)
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011
The proposal to make NC voters show a government-issued photo ID is gaining widespread condemnation by editorial boards across the state. Read these recent editorials from the major newspapers in Asheville, Greensboro, Raleigh, and Wilmington. Smaller papers in places like Ahoskie and little Washington are also covering the issue. The head of the NC Republican Party is asking his members to lobby for the bill (H-351) in a new video, but reporter Mark Binker took the time to debunk the video’s false claims about voter fraud, citing research from Democracy NC. Debate on the bill continues this week (Wednesday, 1 pm, Room 643 of the Legislative Office Building). Students at Johnson C. Smith University in Charlotte held a press conference yesterday to voice their concern that students at private colleges are especially harmed because only student IDs from public colleges are acceptable. The bill sponsors say they may adjust the bill so it does not discriminate against private colleges. Meanwhile, anti-immigration zealots want even tougher restrictions that would eliminate virtually all student IDs. A new version of H-351 that may or may not address these concerns is expected at Wednesday’s meeting.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Monday, March 21st, 2011
Thanks to the leadership of Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the sustained agitation of citizen activists, there are now positive signs that the New York legislature could adopt a public financing program for state elections during this legislative cycle. The program will likely follow the model used in New York City elections, where small-dollar donations raised by qualifying candidates are matched with a substantial multiple, e.g., a $5 grant for each $1 raised from small donors, up to a maximum limit. That model avoids the “rescue funds” provisions in North Carolina and other Voter-Owned Elections programs that provide additional grants to match the money of a large spending opponent; arguments about the constitutionality of that provision will be heard in the US Supreme Court on March 28. If the Court rules against rescue funds, NC and other programs will likely shift to the NYC model. The New York experience illustrates the enduring value of public campaign financing – and the value of the long-haul perspective for achieving political change.
JCSU Students To Rally March 21st
Friday, March 18th, 2011
JCSU Students Plan March 21 Rally To Voice Concerns Over Threat To Voting Rights
Rally to be held on Monday, March 21st starting at 11:00 AM on the steps of Biddle Memorial Hall on the Johnson C. Smith campus.
Student and community leaders, Johnson C. Smith President Dr. Ronald Carter and NC District 40 Senator Malcolm Graham will join JCSU students at a March 21 rally to voice concerns over the voting problems many NC citizens will face should House Bill 351/Senate Bill 352 pass requiring NC voters to present a current government-issued photo ID each time they vote. Since students tend to move frequently, some rally participants are afraid the new requirements will affect their ability to vote. Others are concerned because the data shows that seniors, women, college students, low income people and people of color are all less likely to have government-issued photo ID, will be disproportionately affected by the bill and will find it harder, if not impossible, to vote compared to citizens with current driver’s licenses.
For more information on the rally, please contact Democracy North Carolina organizer Robert Dawkins at (704) 957-3105.
Friday, March 18, 2011
Friday, March 18th, 2011
Here’s a weekend adventure: Explore how the State of North Carolina spends your tax dollars, who gets the big contracts or grants for doing what, and what tax revenues are lost because of loopholes or special breaks (these are called “tax expenditures”). The NC Open Book website is rated among the best in the nation in a new report by US PIRG. The report has some details about the pluses and minuses of our state’s fiscal transparency, and you’ll no doubt be surprised by how much you can learn by using the website and its many links. Let us know your evaluation of the best and worst aspects of NC Open Book.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Thursday, March 17th, 2011
Here’s a sobering essay from Forbes magazine (“the capitalist tool”) about a two-pronged plan by the super-rich in the U.S. to gain even more political clout and wealth at the expense of the middle and working classes. Business publications (like Business Week and Fortune) are so much more straightforward in explaining how capitalism works than the bashful mainstream press. Rick Ungar’s meandering essay explains how gutting the union’s bargaining rights in Wisconsin includes a larger campaign to end the payroll check-off programs that allow public employees to painlessly send a few dollars of each paycheck to their union. The money adds up and gives organized labor the capacity to challenge pro-business political donors in some arenas (although it’s worth noting that the total assets of all unions in the U.S. equal less than the bonuses Goldman Sachs paid its executives in 2007-2009). Ungar says ending the check-off is especially important to business now that Citizen United decision allows labor to spend its general treasury money on ads for specific candidates. He then explains a second stick-it-to-the-needy strategy that is gaining support from leading Democrats and Republicans; it’s actually decades old and we see it here in North Carolina: policymakers are cutting corporate taxes or increasing business subsidies while pushing more costs onto the poor and middle-class taxpayer, pensioner and public employee. Ungar says the business elite are tired of paying for warfare and welfare; taxes are for suckers. Sharing the financial windfall from the increased productivity of a computerized workplace is also unthinkable. Hence, we’re back to the biggest gap between the rich and everybody else since the Robber Barons, and it’s growing wider.
House Bill 351: Bad Law In Motion
Tuesday, March 15th, 2011
House Bill 351 was introduced in the NC General Assembly yesterday requiring NC voters to present government-issued photo ID each time they vote. Our research shows that this bill could negatively affect more than 460,000 active voters statewide who lack a government-issued photo ID, primarily seniors, women, college students and African-American voters. Worse, as our official statement on the bill shows, not only does this fail to address the issue of voter fraud, it actually makes it easier to commit fraud using absentee ballots.
A summary of our statewide findings with a demographic breakdown of affected groups can be found at:
http://www.democracy-nc.org/downloads/VoterIDDataByRaceSexAgePartySumm.doc
If you have any questions about our research, please feel free to contact our Executive Director Bob Hall directly at 919-489-1931.
More Resources
You can download a copy of the bill here:
http://www.democracy-nc.org/downloads/H351v0.pdf
We have also assembled a collection of personal stories from voters explaining why the bill would make it more difficult for people without government-issued IDs to vote and why they are opposed to its passage. You can view these stories at:
http://www.democracy-nc.org/VoterIDStories.html
Democracy North Carolina believes this is an unnecessary, expensive and ineffectual bill. For more on why we say this, please visit our website at:
If you would like to interview anyone from our organization or get in touch with any of the voters who have shared their stories publicly, please call me at 919-286-6000, Ext. 20.
Thanks,
Katy Munger
Communications Director
Democracy North Carolina
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Tuesday, March 15th, 2011
NC GOP leaders finally introduced their voter photo ID bill late yesterday and it’s just a bad bill all around. Not only does it not address the biggest causes of voter fraud, it actually makes it easier to commit absentee ballot fraud, is badly underfunded and imposes a host of costly administrative requirements on NC counties. Learn more about our reaction to the bill here or download the full text of the bill here. For more official reactions to the bill, check out the videos and other coverage at NC Policy Watch. Finally, hear the voices of those most likely to be disenfranchised by this bill.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Monday, March 14th, 2011
Context is always important. These two columns in national publications provide valuable context and important insights into what are the reasonable limits of a code of ethical conduct for Supreme Court justices and what are unreasonable restrictions on voting. The column about voting includes the conservative Cato Institute’s worry that the misplaced drumbeat for a photo ID will feed into the Big Brother nightmare of a national identity card. Leaders of the Libertarian Party of North Carolina are similarly opposed to proposals that would make voters present a government-issued photo ID each time they vote.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Friday, March 11th, 2011
Is there a national effort to make voting harder for young people? The head of Generation18 provides an overview of the issue and the anti-voter efforts across the country, as well as a plea for deeper civics education in our schools. Closer to home, Charlotte WBTV has a cover story on how the issue is playing out in North Carolina, with the catchy title, “The War on Voting?”
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Thursday, March 10th, 2011
The Independent Weekly this week features a blockbuster series of investigative stories about the Art Pope empire. One big shocker: Pope failed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes on his foundation’s earnings for YEARS, eventually begging the IRS for forgiveness with various lame excuses. So Pope turns out to be a miserly tax cheater – no, he’s just a distracted daddy. There are other nuggets in the stories. Did you know that the rightwing Civitas Institute depends on Pope’s foundation for 97% of its money? It’s basically a wholly owned subsidiary of Art Pope. The same goes for several other outfits under the Pope’s authority. The story on elections includes this gem from Pope: “If [my money] helped them win, especially in a close election, then wonderful, but that doesn’t mean I spent millions of dollars to buy the North Carolina legislature.”
