Democracy NC Blog

Welcome to Democracy North Carolina’s main newsfeed. You can review all of our latest blog posts below, starting with the newest post on top, or you can visit our individual sections for more in-depth coverage:

  • Link-of-the-Day offers commentary on our core issues each day, courtesy of our Executive Director Bob Hall.
  • Tales From the Frontline is our official staff blog and it includes a special section just for Democracy Summer.
  • Our Media Feed provides press releases and other information of interest to members of the media.
  • Take Action Now is designed for volunteers with a little or a lot of time to give. It tells you how you can help us with our current advocacy efforts.


You can also subscribe to our main RSS feed or individual category feeds here, and be alerted whenever a new blog post is created.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

September 7th, 2010

Ready or not, Instant Runoff Voting will be used to fill the recent vacancy on the NC Court of Appeals created when Judge Jim Wynn stepped down to serve on the federal court. Gov. Bev Perdue appointed Judge Cressie Thigpen a couple weeks ago to fill the seat temporarily, until a winner in November begins a new eight-year term. Thigpen is the former law partner of Dan Blue, former president of the State Bar, and a Superior Court judge. He’s the only African American among 13 candidates who have filed for the seat. The State Board of Elections last week voted unanimously to produce and mail to 4 million households a special edition of the Judicial Voter Guide (paid for by the Public Campaign Fund, not general tax dollars), with profiles of the candidates and an explanation of how to use Instant Runoff Voting. Commentators are right to wish another method could be used to fill these late vacancies, including merit selection, but the NC constitution and state law don’t provide much wiggle room. Sadly, IRV opponents are ready to distort the truth to score points, as I pointed out in a recent blog response. The focus should be on educating voters about the candidates, the voting method, and perspectives on who’s the best judge for the job.

Monday, September 6, 2010

September 6th, 2010

On this Labor Day, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich succinctly describes how Americans are working longer hours for less pay while the benefits of increased productivity flow to the top 1%; this distorted distribution of the wealth we create means consumers don’t have the money to buy what the economy is capable of producing, and the grandiose expectations of the super-rich promote manipulative investments and political deals that eventually crash. We’re stuck in the Great Recession, says Reich, until we have reforms at least as radical as those used during the Great Depression. It’s worth noting that 1% of the population contributes about 90% of the campaign contributions to politicians. That’s our finding from various studies at Democracy North Carolina and no doubt it holds true elsewhere. For the sake of our economy, our jobs, our future, we need more political leaders who don’t depend on the narrow-minded super-rich.

Friday, September 3, 2010

September 3rd, 2010

Want to get a picture of how big money in politics is crushing real people? Watch this short video from Brave New Foundation about a farmer in Iowa, oyster harvester in Louisiana and coal miner in West Virginia. (Explore the Fair Elections website for more Good Stuff.) The message is clear: people suffer when wealthy special interests block common-sense policies and use politicians to get richer at our expense. The public purpose of government is now so distorted that even reducing the Bush tax cuts for multi-millionaires is considered too difficult, too risky. Meanwhile, the notion that this is the “year of the woman” in Congressional races is being busted by men with greater fundraising clout and connections with the rich. Ready to change the abusive role of private money in elections?

Thursday, September 2, 2010

September 2nd, 2010

Real Jobs NC, the 527 committee backed by Art Pope, Fred Eshelman and the national Republican Party, has begun sending tons of attack-ad mailers to voters in the districts of several state House Democrats who face tight elections. (See August 18 LINK entry.) Mark Binker of the Greensboro News & Record looks into the claims made in the mailers attacking Rep. Hugh Holliman and finds they use the wrong dollar amounts, cite the wrong legislation, attack laws endorsed by plenty of Republican legislators, but still have some factual basis. It would be interesting to see how Rep. Jeff Barnhart and Sen. Fletcher Hartsell voted on the measures that Real Jobs NC finds so loathsome; the two Cabarrus county Republican legislators are officers of RightChange.com Inc., which Fred Eshelman heads and which gave $100,000 to Real Jobs NC.

September 1, 2010

September 1st, 2010

A Texas judge has ordered the national Republican Governors Association to pay $2 million to the state’s Democratic candidate for governor in 2006 because the association illegally funneled $1 million to Republican Gov. Rick Perry from the nation’s biggest individual campaign donor that year. The donation came from Bob Perry, the Houston mega-builder and patron of the Swift Boat attack ads; he is not related to Gov. Perry. The Governor has already paid $426,000  to settle his part of the deceitful practice. RGA is appealing, but the attorney for Chris Bell, the Democratic candidate, points out that the RGA was not even properly registered to make donations to Texas candidates. The judge agreed and also noted that the association failed to disclose its donors until well after the election. Under Texas law, the civil penalty can be awarded to the harmed candidate – hmm, what do you think the pros and cons would be for such a law in North Carolina?

August 31, 2010

August 31st, 2010

At the close of filing today, 13 candidates had signed up to replace Judge Jim Wynn on the NC Court of Appeals. That means North Carolina will host the nation’s first statewide election using the Instant Runoff Voting method in decades. Voters can select up to three candidates in order of their preference, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. Your 2nd and 3rd choices are backups and only count if your 1st choice loses. That’s the core message to voters. The counting works this way: In the first round of counting, only the 1st choices are tallied. If a candidate gets a majority of 1st choices, the election is over – but that’s unlikely with 13 candidates. In a second round of counting, the two candidates with the most 1st choices go into a “virtual” runoff with all of their votes. The ballots of voters who selected other candidates as their 1st choice are then reviewed and their vote goes to whichever runoff candidate they ranked highest. (Some voters may not have picked either, similar to not showing up in a separate runoff.) Here’s how it might work in practice. Say the top two vote getters in the first round, Alpha and Beta, received 23% and 19% of all the first choices. So 42% of the voters have their 1st choice in the runoff; their backup choices are not reviewed. The other 58% of the ballots will be reviewed to see if Alpha or Beta is ranked, and which is ranked higher, as a 2nd or 3rd choice, and that’s where their vote goes. Candidate Alpha may pick up another 12% of the voters and Beta may get another 14%. So Alpha wins with 35% of the votes cast (23% + 12%) over Beta’s 33% (19% + 14%). Neither candidate gets an absolute majority, but Alpha gets a majority of those expressing a preference between the top two vote getters, Alpha and Beta. There will be plenty of naysayers trashing IRV and it is especially challenging with a low-profile judicial election with 13 candidates, but remember this: the General Assembly adopted the IRV method for this kind of election only after 8 candidates ran in 2004 to fill a late vacancy on the NC Supreme Court, and the winner got only 23% of the votes.

Monday, August 30, 2010

August 30th, 2010

Three state Senate races to fill vacancies in southeastern North Carolina could decide whether Democrats or Republicans win majority control of that body. The majority party will use the new Census data to redraw the boundary lines for Congressional and legislative districts for the next decade, with an eye to securing a partisan advantage in as many districts as possible. That’s how the current system legally works – the representatives pick their voters. The high stakes in this round of General Assembly elections means we will see several million-dollar contests, all paid for by private interests, plus record “independent” spending by outside groups. No matter how much is spent, winning still comes down to having the most votes among those cast – the voters pick their representatives, for better or worse.

Friday, August 27, 2010

August 27th, 2010

Mother Jones magazine gives this factoid from a new series by the Center for Responsive Politics: Environmental organizations spent a record $22 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies last year, but for every dollar the groups spent, the oil and gas industry spent eight dollars. Exxon alone spent more on lobbying than all the environmental groups. The Center’s five-day series reveals the insidious power of the oil and gas industry, with links and charts that spell out how we’re getting gassed. The chart on oil/gas campaign contributions fueling members of Congress shows Sen. Richard Burr way ahead of other NC members, in dollars and share of total fundraising; he’s taken over $500,000 in the past decade, about 10 times most other delegation members. Meanwhile, the Washington Post has an interactive map with a host of data about the U.S. House and U.S. Senate elections and the 37 states with gubernatorial elections. From those pages you can navigate to other aspects of the Post’s coverage of federal elections.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

August 26th, 2010

A mere 90 years ago today, a new Nineteenth Amendment to the US Constitution declared, “The right of the citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” Women were voting in some states as early as the 1830s, but most states vigorously resisted, especially in the South, as an op-ed column by historian Christine Stansell points out. The women’s suffrage movement ultimately triumphed, navigating through generational, racial, class and geographic divides and employing a rich array of tactics, from direct action to gentle persuasion. The victory was capped by a mom’s reminder to her son to “be a good boy.” The son, a Tennessee state legislator, changed sides, broke a 48-48 tie and cast the deciding vote that ratified the Nineteenth Amendment in the final state needed for enrollment in the Constitution. You think one vote doesn’t make a difference? Today, women comprise 55% of the registered voters in North Carolina and vote in significantly higher numbers than men. Beth Messersmith of Moms Rising has a good column about practical ways women in NC can be involved in politics and teach others about the importance of voting.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

August 25th, 2010

The State Board of Elections voted 4 to 1 to fine Gov. Bev Perdue’s campaign committee $30,000 for failing to properly disclose private airplane flights donated to her 2008 campaign. An eight-month investigation by the Board’s chief investigator Kim Strach turned up a hodgepodge of incomplete records and compliance problems with the campaign, but not enough indication of criminal wrongdoing to justify an evidentiary hearing. The two Republican board members backed a request by NC GOP Chair Tom Fetzer for such a hearing, but the three Democrats voted that motion down. In weekly press conferences, Fetzer has succeeded in politicizing the investigation, with contradictory demands that it be sped up, concluded, and more probing, and demands that Board Chair Larry Leake and Director Gary Bartlett resign for protecting fellow Democrat, Gov. Perdue. A higher fine could have been justified for the volume of missing information and the poor cooperation of Perdue’s campaign, which dribbled out information to Strach. But Perdue’s campaign manager, Zach Ambrose, pointed out in a letter delivered to State Board members yesterday that he had given the data for the flights to the election staff in early 2008 to see if the documentation requirements were met. Ambrose got a positive review from the Board staff and gave the material to his campaign compliance officers, but for unexplained reasons they did not include some flights on disclosure reports. This was a snafu not an effort to deceive, Ambrose said: “It seems obvious to me that records related to these flights would not have been given by me to the Board in the first half of 2008 if there had been any intention on my part or on the part of the Committee to conceal information about these flights.” Interestingly, the Associated Press story today mentions Ambrose’s letter, but not the News & Observer, which has been playing up the partisan conflict between Fetzer and the State Board.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

August 24th, 2010

Two quick updates: One fun, one bum. Last Thursday’s LINK described the growing protest over Target’s decision to use its corporate money to meddle in a gubernatorial election in Minnesota. One sure sign of a protest movement is folks creating their own way to deliver a message and have some fun, too. Check out the spirited flashmob with the message, Target ain’t people! Another sure sign: You know you’re dealing with a real louse when a billionaire tries to buy enough goodwill to cover over his perverse anti-social behavior. Check out this amazing New Yorker magazine profile of the David Koch (per last Friday’s LINK), brother Charles, and the origins of Americans for Prosperity.

Monday, August 23, 2010

August 23rd, 2010

The 14 chemical companies that put the most residents in the US at risk from poisonous gas leaks or terrorist attack include JCI Jones’s Charlotte facility that manufactures and distributes chlorine, sulfur dioxide and other hazardous products. A new report by US PIRG says over 800,000 people live within the immediate danger zone around the JCI Jones’ Charlotte facility. The PIRG report details the lobbying and political contributions that the 14 companies and their trade associations have invested to fight proposals requiring chemical companies to assess their risks and shift to less dangerous processes where appropriate. The House-passed Chemical and Water Security Act (H.R. 2868) is stalled in the Senate, thanks in part to this investment which especially targets members of key Congressional committees. Other corporations on the list include Clorox, Dow, DuPont, and Honeywell. JCI Jones makes the list not because of its political spending, which doesn’t register in this report, but because it ranks third among corporations exposing the most people to poisonous gas leaks – 12 million people living around 11 facilities in the US. The report notes that if you think accidents don’t happen, think BP.

Friday, August 20, 2010

August 20th, 2010

Which candidates for the NC General Assembly have the most money to spend before the election? The NC Free Enterprise Foundation posted convenient lists of the cash-on-hand for candidates in the state House and state Senate elections, based on disclosure reports through June 30, 2010. For example, Senate Democratic candidates Margaret Dickson, David Redwine, Jim Leutze and Dewey Hudson trailed their opponents in open seat contests. All House Democratic candidates have 2.4 times as much as Republicans, but Senate Republican candidates are basically even with Democrats, thanks largely to loans many have made to themselves (e.g., Neal Hunt, Richard Stevens and Don East). It will be interesting to see how much money the flush candidates share with their colleagues in tight races. Importantly, Republicans gained control of the state House in the 1994 election after achieving fundraising parity with Democrats for the first time in many decades.

Thursday, August 19, 2010

August 19th, 2010

The bull’s-eye on Target is getting bigger. As we described in our August 2 entry, the retailer donated $100,000 to a business group for ads supporting a rightwing gubernatorial candidate in its home state of Minnesota. It gave another $50,000 to help the group’s operations. Now Target is paying the price and teaching other corporations about the backlash they may experience if they use their customers money to sway an election. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, Target is not a voter, not a person, not a friend. You can let the company know what you think through the MoveOn link. And you can use the example as a call for broad reforms, as the Brennan Center does.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

August 18th, 2010

J. Art Pope, the rightwing sugar daddy for the John Locke Foundation and big donor to Americans for Prosperity, is using a 527 committee to funnel his corporation’s money into political ads aimed at discrediting Democratic candidates for the NC General Assembly in this fall’s election. Pope has done this before with six-figure donations from Variety Wholesalers, owners of Rose’s, Maxway, Super Dollar and other retail stores. (Yes, he uses revenues from his low/moderate-income customers to promote his anti-government agenda!) The first ad doesn’t mention candidates by name, but the 527 committee (Real Jobs NC) has already filed a disclosure report announcing that it’s going after Democratic incumbents Alice Underhill and Hugh Holliman. Other donors of Real Jobs NC including the Republican State Leadership Committee and RightChange.com which includes Republican state legislators Fletcher Hartsell and Jeff Barnhart as officers. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity announced it is launching a $4.1 million dollar ad campaign in 11 states to influence the outcome in 24 Congressional elections. AFP is taking advantage of the new Citizens United ruling that allows it to use corporate money for electioneering without setting up a PAC or 527 committee; and because Congress has not enacted the DISCLOSE Act, the donors will remain a mystery. The founding chairman and major patron of AFP is David Koch of Koch Industries, a notoriously secretive conglomerate and exporter of jobs. Thanks to a new law adopted this year in North Carolina, it would be harder for AFP to keep its donors hidden if it financed a similar series of ads attacking state (rather than federal) candidates. The use of mystery corporate money to corrupt elections with Supreme Court protection continues to rankle sensible people and merit state and national media attention.

Page 1 of 101234510...Last »